Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Dhruv Matani wrote:

> Ok. Let me explain what I am trying to do: 
> I have a pointer to some type T which is not the one parameterizing the
> allocator.
A *very down to earth* proposal: can't you simply stop referring internally
to unsigned int (T is unsigned int currently, right?) which is only 16 
bits both
on 32-bit and 64-bit machines? Can't you just use a wider type? Long would
do much better, I'm sure, since it's 8 bytes on 64-bit machines, and, 
possibly,
if the user wants to configure for the best alignment, you could just 
consider
pairs of those objects as your basic internal units.

Also, remember that if you allocate bookkeeping data in the memory returned
by ::operator new, that data must also be aligned according to its type 
and then,
in general, you need padding between that data and your usable memory: f.i.,
if you store a single int in an header, you need, for best alignement, 4 
bytes
(or 12 bytes) of padding in the middle.

Paolo.