Re: [v3] std::tr1::array

[Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>]

>Benjamin, shall we setup also the testsuite? I'm not sure about the
>best way to
>call the directories: testsuite/tr1/??? I propose something similar to 
>what we
>already have for the standard, therefore:
>
>    2_general_utilities
>    3_function_objects
>    4_metaprogramming
>    5_numerical_facilies

facilities

>    6_containers
>    7_regular_expressions
>    8_c_compatibility
>
>Agreed? 

Agreed: your plan sounds good to me. I think it's best to add the
directories on an as-needed basis.

Actually, I wanted to set the bar kind of high with these new additions:
implementation, docs, testsuites. The lack of testsuite coverage in some
parts of GNU STL is still worrisome, and I'd like to avoid falling into
this trap again. I plan on checking in array testsuite bits momentarily.

-benjamin