Re: [v3] std::tr1::array

[Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>]

On Oct 8, 2004, at 5:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 05:10:20PM -0500, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> > Alright! The feedback looks uniformly positive so I went ahead and
> > checked this in.
> >
> > So far the following people seem or seemed interested in the following
> > things, at some time or another:
> >
> > 1) matt: hash bits
> > 2) paolo, gaby, phil:  type_traits
> > 3) chris: tuple
> >
> > Sounds great to me! I'd suggest that you ping the list before starting
> > work.
>
> If noone's working on it (Pétur?) I could start copying the Boost smart
> pointers, uglifying, changing namespaces, porting the locking to
> gthreads etc.
>
> The regexes and function objects could come from Boost too, right?

Assuming they comply with the TR1 specification and they're
license-compatible, I don't see why not.  (Don't just assume
they implement the TR1 requirements!  Even the components
that came originally from Boost have been changed somewhat
in the process of putting them into the TR.

			--Matt