This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

ping?


I have over the last few weeks sent 3 patches to the libstdc++ list (search_n random_access specialisation, reverse random_access fix to stop swapping middle element of odd length vectors and using swap to perform iter_swap). None of these seem to have made their way into CVS.

I can imagine a number of good reasons for this, including I didn't do something I was supposed to, the patches don't give enough benefit for anyone to care enough, they have to wait to be reviewed by someone with alot of knowledge who are all busy, or at the moment anything not on the gcc 4.0 critical path is being ignored. I was just wondering which (or all) of these was the problem, and if there is anything I should do to stop them "sinking through the cracks"? Submit the problems & patches to bugzilla perhaps?

Thank you, and sorry for complaining,

Chris


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]