Re: RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

Zack Weinberg wrote:

> Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:
>
>  
>
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:51:03 -0700, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > > I think that's pretty compelling, and I'm actually pretty sanguine about
> > > > the safety of the patch.  I've reviewed the patch and I'm happy with it.  I
> > > > certainly agree that issuing the diagnostics on the line with the function
> > > > declaration is a win.
> > > >
> > > > I think that it would be good for Jason to comment, before we make a final
> > > > decision
> > > >        
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:41:19PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > I agree.
> > >      
> > You agree that it would be good for you to comment, or you agree that you
> > are happy with the patch? :-)
> >    
>
> I hope he meant the latter, because I thought that's what he meant and
> therefore I checked the patch in about three hours ago.
>  
That's what I thought Jason meant as well.  If it's not, he'll let you 
know, and we'll back it out...

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com