This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: RFA: bootstrap/16469: use of find without -print
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
- To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:59:39 +0200
- Subject: Re: RFA: bootstrap/16469: use of find without -print
- References: <200407181823.i6IINjx16192@tin.geop.uc.edu> <200407182132.10702.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <87pt6t5c3b.fsf@redhat.com>
> Was this mainline or branch?
I hit the problem on the 3.4 branch.
> It looks like your recent mainline results are OK:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-07/msg00828.html
>
> and LAST_UPDATED seems to be after the commit. Were the failing tests
> run on the same machine? If not, does the other machine run the same
> version of solaris?
I saw the problem on several Solaris machines (at least Solaris 8 and 9).
When I reverted the patch on the Sol 8 box, everything worked again.
> FWIW, I've just tested the command on 3.4 branch using a solaris2.6 box
> and didn't see any problems. There was no special version of find in
> PATH, so find == /usr/bin/find.
Thanks for checking. find is /bin/find on the various Solaris boxes,
although it's very likely the same version as /usr/bin/find.
Anyway, I was able to do the usual testing with the 3.4 branch on the 5
Solaris machines yesterday and today, so it appears that everything works
again. It might have been a local problem with NFS.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Eric Botcazou