This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Andreas Kohn <andreas at syndrom23 dot de>, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 13 Aug 2004 15:47:48 +0200
Subject: Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <1092356640.67016.39.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org><D91766AD-ECCC-11D8-B046-000393B2ABA2@apple.com><1092364332.67016.46.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org><411C9349.6000303@suse.de><m33c2r9v12.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><1092395417.67016.67.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org><20040813125149.GA71662@compsoc.man.ac.uk>

Jonathan Wakely <cow@compsoc.man.ac.uk> writes:

| I am sure I've missed something, but I'm tempted to consider a const
| fstream a case of applying the rule a little too rigidly.

You've nicely put what I've been thinking.

-- Gaby

References:
- Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?
  - From: Andreas Kohn
- Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?
  - From: Matt Austern
- Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?
  - From: Andreas Kohn
- Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?
  - From: Andreas Kohn
- Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]