This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: another effc++ spurious warning?

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 19:21:38 +0200
Subject: Re: another effc++ spurious warning?
References: <066601c464e7$26741020$a54a2597@bagio> <40ED4313.703@suse.de> <06cf01c464ee$57acc130$a54a2597@bagio> <32793.::ffff:128.194.146.36.1089296733.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> <075d01c46515$4e4e7620$a54a2597@bagio> <20040708183931.GE15321@tofu.dreamhost.com>

Nathan Myers wrote:

> We already have a feature to prevent warnings originating from system
> headers.  Why does it fail in this case?

It doesn't fail. The error comes from v3 compilation with CXXFLAGS="-Weffc++".
-- 
Giovanni Bajo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: another effc++ spurious warning?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- another effc++ spurious warning?
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: another effc++ spurious warning?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: another effc++ spurious warning?
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: another effc++ spurious warning?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: another effc++ spurious warning?
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: another effc++ spurious warning?
  - From: Nathan Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]