This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] std::string(0);


On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 22:01, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 14 Jun 2004 21:04:05 +0530, Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> > However, that brings another thing to my mind. I have seen at many
> > places stuff like this:
> >
> > &*end();
> >
> > So, would the above be valid?
> 
> I believe there's still an open core language issue about that :}

Oh, ok!


BTW, how does gcc specifically handle the case say when you apply
&*end() to en empty default constructed vector?

-- 
        -Dhruv Matani.
http://www.geocities.com/dhruvbird/

Proud to be a Vegetarian.
http://www.vegetarianstarterkit.com/
http://www.vegkids.com/vegkids/index.html



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]