This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] RE: Testsuite problem

From: Pétur Runólfsson <peturr02 at ru dot is>
To: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Benjamin Kosnik" <bkoz at redhat dot com>,<libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:05:03 -0000
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RE: Testsuite problem

Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Oh, yuck, you're right.  In that case the only way to make this test
> reliably test what it's supposed to, will be to introduce a .fdopen()
> extension method

There already is such a thing. It's named stdio_filebuf.

> so that we can provide exactly the right flags to the
> open() system call.

Which is exactly what the attached patch does.

Petur

2004-04-27  Petur Runolfsson  <peturr02@ru.is>

	* testsuite/27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc (test_07):
	Open fifo with open(name, O_WRONLY), make sure close fails,
	use alarm to prevent child from hanging, add comments.

Attachment: 9964.cc.diff-2
Description: 9964.cc.diff-2

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] RE: Testsuite problem
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]