This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: analysis of libiberty/cp-demangle.c forlibsupc++/__cxa_demangle
Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
> | > I don't think anybody had proposed actually removing the Wood/C++
> | > demangler. Did I miss an email?
> |
> | The only reason I've seen for keeping it is the user-selectable
> | allocator capability. Has Ian now added that to the libiberty
> | demangler?
>
> So in the end, you're proposing the removal of Wood/C++-based
> demangler? I need a clear answer, not a circumvoluted one.
> Mark has said that wasn't his intent -- even if he would not have
> choosed that.
I was considering that possibility *if* the C++ demangler did not
provide any additional functionality. From further discussion, it
is clear that it does, so I am fine with keeping it.
zw