This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: _GLIBCXX_ASSERT lossage
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- To: Pétur Runólfsson <peturr02 at ru dot is>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:54:08 +0100
- Subject: Re: _GLIBCXX_ASSERT lossage
- References: <07D05A69A3D0C14FAEA60C3ACE8E5564028F561B@mail.ru.is>
Pétur Runólfsson wrote:
However, I haven't seen any test case that uses VERIFY, but requires
that _GLIBCXX_ASSERT should not be defined (I may have missed some
though) so this seems pretty bogus.
Yes, seems bogus to me too, now. Probably, time ago had an actual
use... dunno...
Let's wait a bit for other opinions: I vote in favor of simply removing
the thing and unconditionally having VERIFY equivalent to an assert.
Benjamin?
Paolo.