This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Shouldn't advance be defined for ostream_iterator?
- From: "Neal D. Becker" <nbecker at hns dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:07:09 -0500
- Subject: Shouldn't advance be defined for ostream_iterator?
ostream_iterator has operator++ (nop), but no generic advance. I believe
advance should be defined:
namespace std {
template<class T, class charT, class traits, typename dist_t>
inline void advance (ostream_iterator<T,charT,traits>, dist_t) {}
};