This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] My proposal for _Alloc_traits-free rope

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: pcarlini at suse dot de, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, austern at apple dot com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:43:04 -0600
Subject: Re: [Patch] My proposal for _Alloc_traits-free rope
Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
References: <3FF0020A.7060804@suse.de><20040106215201.2a9b0aa1.bkoz@redhat.com><20040109184027.72990aca.bkoz@redhat.com><20040110153211.GA28080@disaster.jaj.com>

>Suggest we deprecate the whole thing for 3.4 (along with slist?  hmmm)
>and kill it in 3.5.

Well, the point is to not rework for the new allocator model. Paolo has
done rope, but who knows. Paolo, I think that you've given Matt more
than enough time to respond to this: if he hasn't responded by tonight,
please check in the rope bits you've done.

Right now, rope, slist, and bvector need to be reworked. 

We need to finish the allocator transition ASAP.

-benjamin

References:
- Re: [Patch] My proposal for _Alloc_traits-free rope
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [Patch] My proposal for _Alloc_traits-free rope
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [Patch] My proposal for _Alloc_traits-free rope
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]