This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR 10975


On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:40:36PM -0800, Nathan Myers wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:00:16PM -0500, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> > I posted a comment to PR 10975 and think it's invalid, but I'd
> > appreciate someone else eyeballing the analysis in case I missed
> > something.
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10975
> 
> I agree that the standard is pretty clear on what is required,
> paragraph 11 in particular.  
> 
> This is pretty clearly a defect in the standard.  

Following up further... There's no requirement for the pointers to be 
initialized to 0.  They could just as well all point to ((charT*) this), 
for example.  Then, the letter of the standard would be satisfied, and 
we could do the right thing immediately, independently of progress on
the DR.

Nathan Myers
ncm-nospam@cantrip.org


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]