This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Missing inlines?

From: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>
To: Joerg dot Richter at pdv-FS dot de
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:20:32 +0000
Subject: Re: Missing inlines?
References: <E8CDBCCCB3158347AC15ADEBFB24A84F482DD4@fsexchng.pdv-fs.de>

On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:56:06PM +0100, Joerg.Richter@pdv-FS.de wrote:

> >| Is this behavior standard? Or is this GCC specific?
> >
> >GCC behaviour is standard-required  behaviour.
> 
> Can you confirm it for GCC 3.2.1 or only for mainline?

G++ has correctly allowed templates to be defined in headers without the
"inline" keyword since it supported templates - well before version 3.

*If* it doesn't work correctly that is a compiler bug, not a bug in the
libstdc++-v3 library. The stl_algo.h header is fine.

jon

-- 
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing
 he was never reasoned into."
	- Jonathan Swift

References:
- RE: Missing inlines?
  - From: Joerg . Richter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]