This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Missing inlines?

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Joerg dot Richter at pdv-FS dot de, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 11 Dec 2003 11:04:41 +0100
Subject: Re: Missing inlines?
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <E8CDBCCCB3158347AC15ADEBFB24A84F482DD1@fsexchng.pdv-fs.de><20031211092854.GA67641@compsoc.man.ac.uk>

Jonathan Wakely <cow@compsoc.man.ac.uk> writes:

[...]

| > But Bo Persson wrote that templates are automatic inline. So it should not
| > matter. But it is interesting why it seems to fix my problems.
| 
| No, they're not automatically inline.

Yes.

Unfortunately, some broken proprietary compilers have managed to make
their users into believeing that they have to put "inline" in the
definition of their templates.  Thus perverting the meaning of
"inline". And they go on introducing "__forceinline" for approximating
the meaning of "inline" :-(

-- Gaby

References:
- RE: Missing inlines?
  - From: Joerg . Richter
- Re: Missing inlines?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]