This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: PATCH (for top-level): in-src configuration (still) broken
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: rittle at labs dot mot dot com
- Cc: rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:59:23 -0600
- Subject: Re: PATCH (for top-level): in-src configuration (still) broken
- Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
- References: <200312091145.hB9Bjcsi039259@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
>This is the most robust patch I found to fix our problem. I say: "too
>bad" to those people that want the staging for vanity's sake; now that
>we dictate GNU make, it is time to reap some real benefits. Any
>comments from fellow libstdc++-v3 maintainers before I ask the global
>build machinery maintainers to approve/rework/reject it?
I like this tough love approach to the configure/build process! Long
overdue.
>Enforcing this
>policy at top-level might also allow us to unhack numerous other
>special cases in target-only libraries. Wouldn't that be special...
Yes, it would....
> * Makefile.def (target_modules) [libstdc++-v3]: Do not stage.
> * Makefile.tpl (configure-target-[+module+]): Support no_stage.
> * Makefile: Rebuilt.
This looks fine to me. You might as well ask for permission from the top-level folks.
-benjamin