This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: The mangling changed.
- From: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 03:47:51 +0100
- Subject: Re: The mangling changed.
- References: <20031130021827.GA20476@alinoe.com> <m3ad6ewq0i.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20031130031822.GA25321@alinoe.com> <m34qwm7c3q.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20031202101339.0c7bc8f7.bkoz@redhat.com> <m3vfoy7i4w.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:24:47AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | ANYTHING TO AVOID UPPERCASE EMAILS.
>
> people sending such uppercase mails say they're sick of such
> discussion and ask other whether they understand basic mathematics
> (when actually other's living jobs are professional mathematics) and
> fail to understand the effect their mails can produce on people who
> don't agree with them.
I appologize to having used six uppercase characters in the Subject,
which actually was not meant to draw attention. 'Eeeeks' is an
exclamation and usually shouted, so I thought uppercase was an
appropriate style. I think you (both) fall more over the 'a-serious'
style of the subject than the use of upper case.
However, Gaby - I don't think this deserved the low reply that you
just posted in public. If you have something on your chest, I am
willing to talk about it in private and get to a mutal understanding.
A week ago I have written a last private (and polite) mail in an
attempt to straighten out any misunderstandings between us. You
have not replied to it. That is your fine choice, but then why
the above reply on a public mailinglist?
--
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>