This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: _Rb_tree + allocator observations

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:36:53 +0100
Subject: Re: _Rb_tree + allocator observations
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311072036110.5264-100000@nondot.org> <3FB26793.4080500@unitus.it> <BA63BD41-1590-11D8-A466-000393B2ABA2@apple.com>

Matt Austern wrote:

Dunno if Nathan has something to add, but I do.  I wrote that comment,
and the code it applies to.  I wrote it for reasons that are no longer
relevant.  (I was supporting two versions of the allocator interface,
one of which nobody cares about anymore, and I was supporting the SGI
compiler, which at the time didn't optimize empty base classes.)

Thanks for your feedback: therefore my first impression was basically right...

It's possible to make *huge* simplifications in that code.  I should
get around to doing that.

It would be great!

Paolo.

References:
- _Rb_tree + allocator observations
  - From: Chris Lattner
- Re: _Rb_tree + allocator observations
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: _Rb_tree + allocator observations
  - From: Matt Austern

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]