This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Interpretation of DR 198 resolution

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: Bo Persson <bop at gmb dot dk>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 01:22:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] Interpretation of DR 198 resolution
References: <3FB0BE4D.4030501@suse.de> <20031111162946.GB29011@tofu.dreamhost.com> <3FB12AB2.8090408@unitus.it> <046901c3a887$fdd79040$0200a8c0@Dell>

Bo Persson wrote:

It is dependent on the other part of DR#198:

"Destruction of an iterator may invalidate pointers and references previously obtained from that iterator"

If that sentence is accepted, the reference returned from operator*() might be invalid after tmp is destroyed. If...

Now I see. Thanks!

Paolo.

References:
- [RFC] Interpretation of DR 198 resolution
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFC] Interpretation of DR 198 resolution
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: [RFC] Interpretation of DR 198 resolution
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFC] Interpretation of DR 198 resolution
  - From: Bo Persson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]