This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libstdc++ debugging, was:Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ andlibstdc++ test failures on sparc[64]

From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
To: Pétur Runólfsson <peturr02 at ru dot is>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:04:24 +0200
Subject: Re: libstdc++ debugging, was:Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ andlibstdc++ test failures on sparc[64]
References: <07D05A69A3D0C14FAEA60C3ACE8E5564028F55EB@mail.ru.is> <3F86AAC7.1000504@pop.agri.ch>

Andreas Tobler wrote:

Pétur Runólfsson wrote:

What is the prefered way to go?

Maybe 3) Do nothing?

Hmmm.
Have you seen this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-10/msg00432.html
It probably has something to do with this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-10/msg00150.html
I revert and test again. This seems strange to me.

Revert the removed else leads to the previous result. FAIL of all testcases.

Andreas

References:
- RE: libstdc++ debugging, was:Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ and libstdc++ test failures on sparc[64]
  - From: Pétur Runólfsson
- Re: libstdc++ debugging, was:Re: Heads up: Several thousand g++ andlibstdc++ test failures on sparc[64]
  - From: Andreas Tobler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]