This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ demangler horrors

From: Peter Barada <peter at baradas dot org>
To: carlo at alinoe dot com
Cc: phil at jaj dot com, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, hjl at lucon dot org,ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, neroden at twcny dot rr dot com,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:11:41 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: C++ demangler horrors
References: <20030626170806.GA1119@doctormoo> <20030626172655.GA21939@lucon.org> <200306261848.OAA24657@caip.rutgers.edu> <20030626185150.GD23280@lucon.org> <200306261859.OAA26891@caip.rutgers.edu> <m33chve2au.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20030627194743.GA14028@lucon.org> <m38yrncjx2.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20030627211300.GA6618@disaster.jaj.com> <20030627224108.GA29388@alinoe.com>

>If it is a problem that one needs a C++ compiler to generate
>libdemangle.a, then I'd say: you can distribute that as binary
>in order to allow people to produce libiberty without needing
>a C++ compiler.

Then I can not build a toolchain for a *new* architecture since I have
to be able to build *everything* from source.

-- 
Peter Barada
peter@baradas.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ demangler horrors
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: C++ demangler horrors
  - From: Carlo Wood

References:
- Re: C++ demangler horrors
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: C++ demangler horrors
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: C++ demangler horrors
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: C++ demangler horrors
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: C++ demangler horrors
  - From: Carlo Wood

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]