This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string

From: Martin Sebor <sebor at roguewave dot com>
To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:18:10 -0600
Subject: Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
Organization: Rogue Wave Software, Inc.
References: <200306122056.h5CKu0fm070610@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> <3EE8ED6F.3030007@unitus.it> <20030612214456.GZ8942@tofu.dreamhost.com>

Nathan Myers wrote:
...

Numerics people I talk to, by the way, say that each C compiler release since 2.7 has generated slower code than the last, and they're starting to get very testy about it.


That's been our general experience as well (although it's not
necessarily specific to floating point computations). See my
post comparing the performance of 2.95.2 vs 3.2 on SPARC here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-12/msg01432.html. IIRC,
we saw a similar regression on i86.

Regards
Martin

References:
- Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
  - From: Loren James Rittle
- Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Nathan's improvements to basic_string
  - From: Nathan Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]