Re: ext/mt_alloc.h

[Stefan Olsson <stefan at snon dot net>]

Phil Edwards wrote:

> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 07:02:46PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
>  
>
> > In article <20030521183008.2089e4bc.bkoz@redhat.com>,
> > Benjamin Kosnik<bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > I'm still in favor of moving extra things out of namespace std in
> > > stl_alloc.h and into ext. Does anybody have strong feelings about this?
> > >      
> > No.  It does seem that anything not in the standard should be outside
> > namespace std and/or named using our implementor space (i.e. leading
> > underscores, etc).  Also, it does seem that almost everything we
> > advertise to users should not be named in our implementor space.
> >    
>
> Yeah, we should split __gnu_cxx into two.
>
>
> I'm thinking of just mailing the "90% done" patch for the allocator rewrite
> to Stefan, since he's making progress far faster than me.  :-)
Hi!

Well, we are busy working on another project right now - but just let us 
know what needs to be done and we'll dig into it a.s.a.p

Brgds

/Stefan

> Phil
>
>  


--
A real person has two reasons for doing anything... 
...a good reason and the real reason.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature