This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC/Patch] What about using seekoff(-1, ...) for unbufferedunderflow?
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:50:12 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC/Patch] What about using seekoff(-1, ...) for unbufferedunderflow?
- References: <3EE0876C.4060004@unitus.it>
>I'm looking a bit into the new framework for unbuffered input,
>and I'd rather prefer having sbumpc() simple as it was before.
... and seeking after every input? Don't think that's going to fly.
There have been performance bugs about this in the past.
>Also, keeping _M_buf_size in basic_filebuf only.
Eh...
-benjamin