This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 17:12:46 +0200
Subject: Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
References: <3EDA5CF0.9020207@unitus.it> <3EDB0994.2060903@unitus.it> <20030602095359.2c02f6fa.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

Tested x86-linux. Ok?

No, this is not correct. Furthermore, I do have the correct patch. I
thought I'd told you I was working on this....

I would appreciate some additional explanations. In general, I didn't mean to work on the unbuffered bits: just tackled the PR (which by itself has nothing to do with buffering) then thought to provide the unbuffered pbackfail (not others) bits.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: + unbuffered bits (Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9761)
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]