This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
[Patch] Remove a dead seekoff from _M_underflow
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 19:03:57 +0200
- Subject: [Patch] Remove a dead seekoff from _M_underflow
Hi,
consider this code from the current _M_underflow:
if (this->_M_in_cur < this->_M_in_end)
{
__ret = traits_type::to_int_type(*this->_M_in_cur);
if (__bump)
_M_move_in_cur(1);
return __ret;
}
// Sync internal and external buffers.
// NB: __testget -> __testput as _M_buf_unified here.
if (this->_M_in_cur > this->_M_in_beg)
{
if (__testout)
_M_overflow();
else if (this->_M_in_cur != _M_filepos)
_M_file.seekoff(this->_M_in_cur - _M_filepos, ios_base::cur,
ios_base::in);
}
When !__testout for sure _M_out_cur_move is never called and this
implies that _M_in_end is stuck at the value set by the last
_M_set_buffer call. Since in the code above __testin is true,
_M_in_end == _M_filepos (see _M_set_buffer) and therefore, in the
second block above always _M_in_cur == _M_filepos.
I also take the occasion to rewrite the resulting simplified 'if'
in terms of _M_out_* pointers (equivalent but more clear, IMO) and
remove a redundant 'if' not shown above: everywhere else
_M_destroy_pback is called without checking for _M_pback_init, this
is only a remnant from a previous more convoluted 'if' block.
Tested x86-linux, also put an abort() in the original code in place
of the removed 'if' branch and ran the testsuite.
Paolo.
//////////
2003-05-22 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
* include/bits/fstream.tcc (_M_underflow): simplify:
!__testout implies _M_filepos == _M_in_end, therefore
the first _M_file.seekoff call is never issued.
diff -urN libstdc++-v3-orig/include/bits/fstream.tcc libstdc++-v3/include/bits/fstream.tcc
--- libstdc++-v3-orig/include/bits/fstream.tcc 2003-05-16 01:43:14.000000000 +0200
+++ libstdc++-v3/include/bits/fstream.tcc 2003-05-22 13:05:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -196,8 +196,7 @@
// Check for pback madness, and if so swich back to the
// normal buffers and jet outta here before expensive
// fileops happen...
- if (_M_pback_init)
- _M_destroy_pback();
+ _M_destroy_pback();
if (this->_M_in_cur < this->_M_in_end)
{
@@ -208,15 +207,8 @@
}
// Sync internal and external buffers.
- // NB: __testget -> __testput as _M_buf_unified here.
- if (this->_M_in_cur > this->_M_in_beg)
- {
- if (__testout)
- _M_overflow();
- else if (this->_M_in_cur != _M_filepos)
- _M_file.seekoff(this->_M_in_cur - _M_filepos, ios_base::cur,
- ios_base::in);
- }
+ if (__testout && this->_M_out_beg < this->_M_out_lim)
+ _M_overflow();
if (_M_buf_size > 1)
{