This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller

From: Sylvain Pion <Sylvain dot Pion at mpi-sb dot mpg dot de>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
Cc: Sylvain Pion <Sylvain dot Pion at mpi-sb dot mpg dot de>, gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 18:42:54 +0200
Subject: Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller
References: <3EC7E096.5040103@unitus.it> <20030518224528.GF22583@tofu.dreamhost.com> <20030522175818.A24375@contact.mpi-sb.mpg.de> <3ECCFD4C.5090503@unitus.it>

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 06:39:40PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >What do you think ?
> >
> I'm not a language lawyer, perhaps Nathan or others will have more to 
> say, but it seems to me that, according to 24.4.1.1 you cannot simply 
> remove that derivation.

I am not proposing to remove the derivation from reverse_iterator, I propose to
remove the derivation from __normal_iterator, which is not standard and doesn't
have these derivation requirements.

Or did I miss anything ?

-- 
Sylvain

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller
  - From: Nathan Myers

References:
- Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller
  - From: Sylvain Pion
- Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]