This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH (libstdc++-v3): Fix libstdc++/7680 (and a reference fix for the dynamic visibility of C99 features in system headers)

From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
To: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, ncm at cantrip dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:15:08 -0400
Subject: Re: PATCH (libstdc++-v3): Fix libstdc++/7680 (and a reference fix for the dynamic visibility of C99 features in system headers)
References: <200304160031.h3G0VpBt043952@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> <200304160813.h3G8D0Sv012974@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>

On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 03:13:00AM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> In article <20030416025821 dot GC31329 at tofu dot dreamhost dot com> Nathan writes:
> >
> >  #define _USE_FOO 1  // yes
> >  #define _USE_BAR 0  // no
> >  #define _USE_BAZ 1  // yes

Aha.  That's the part I couldn't think of.  (Stupid brain.)


Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams

References:
- Re: PATCH (libstdc++-v3): Fix libstdc++/7680 (and a reference fix for the dynamic visibility of C99 features in system headers)
  - From: Loren James Rittle
- Re: PATCH (libstdc++-v3): Fix libstdc++/7680 (and a reference fix for the dynamic visibility of C99 features in system headers)
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]