This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] Possible fix for PR 5730

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: Jerry Quinn <jlquinn at optonline dot net>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:18:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3] Possible fix for PR 5730
References: <E18veFm-0003IA-00@tiamat>

Jerry Quinn wrote:

I just tried the test case comparing gcc 2.95 and 3.3 branch.  The gap is now
smaller than the reporter saw, but it is there:

gcc 2.95 1.2s gcc 3.3 1.6s

...

Anyway, I thought that if the more accurate answer is required, the faster
solution could still be used under --fast-math.  Opinions?

Hi Jerry, The most obvious curiosity: does the alternate code close the gap? Is that the very same code actually used in v2 and therefore the answer trivially positive?

Paolo.

References:
- [v3] Possible fix for PR 5730
  - From: Jerry Quinn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]