This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Recent regressions in the testsuite
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: phil at jaj dot com
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:33:19 -0600
- Subject: Re: Recent regressions in the testsuite
- References: <20030319012503.GA3763@disaster.jaj.com>
>This is what the autocrasher would have reported if I didn't have it
>running in "only pester me" mode:
>
> libstdc++-v3.sum 22_locale/ctype/is/wchar_t/wrapped_env.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/2.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/2.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum 22_locale/time_put/put/char/9.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum 22_locale/time_put/put/wchar_t/9.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum 23_containers/deque_ctor.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum backward/header_deque_h.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum backward/header_hashtable_h.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum backward/header_rope_h.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum ext/allocators.cc
> libstdc++-v3.sum ext/rope.cc
are the wchar_t fails that are (not) shown on your report above, but on
your website, due to the libgcc issue? if not, what is going on?
curious,
benjamin