Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/10097

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> Yo Paolo, this looks good. Please make the created temporary files in
> the testsuite start with tmp_*: see my last check in.
Ok.

> > 3- Return to 9701 to fix the second part: seems easy in
> >    the light of some obervations from Nathan.
> > 4- Finally return to 9423/9024, and then 9875/9178.
> >    
>
> I would really like to investigate the idea of completely separate
> unbuffered/buffered filebuf classes for narrow and wide input. Petur
> proposed a wide one, but I think it's the way to go for both. I'll work
> on doing this, or at least a proof of concept, or getting to the point
> where I can explain it.
Great! To be honest, I have been mostly following smaller scale issues 
or, on the other hand,
performance issues, under Nathan's guide (the fix for 9701 will be half 
and half), far less this
kind of new design ideas. I look forward to see your work!

> I really need to fix up the 27 testsuites. Ugh. If I do that, would you
> please consider doing 21 in parallel? Ugh. If we both work on it I bet
> we could get both done in the next week. Would you please, please
> consider doing this important work with me this week instead? I really
> need help with this, and you are the 21_strings maintainer. Or, we could
> flip for it and the one who loose could do 27.
Indeed, Benjamin, you can count on my help. I will do 21, in parallel 
with 27, after the last pending commits affecting 27, before 
libstdc++/9701 and the other 27_io PRs, which will wait for a 
restructured testsuite.

Only one thing: I'm not so good at removing files and creating 
directories with CVS :(
Is it ok with you if, to be safe, I prepare the restructured set of 
directories as a tarball, and you commit the final changes?

Paolo.