This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9659
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- To: Nathan Myers <ncm-nospam at cantrip dot org>
- Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:35:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9659
- References: <3E48DA25.email@example.com> <20030211144105.GH23346@tofu.dreamhost.com>
Nathan Myers wrote:
This looks to me like a grave compiler bug. It should be fixed in the
compiler, not in the library. In particular we shouldn't release anyHi Nathan. Thanks for you reply. And I'm particularly pleased since, as
you know, I'm the author of that line which is giving us troubles ;) ...
Indeed, naively, seems weird that, being operator+ defined inside fpos
besides operator+=, an user of pos_type cannot use that syntax.
new compiler version that has this bug.
Could you please explain in a little more techincal detail what seems
wrong with the compiler?
Afterwards, we may possibly apply the temporary hack and, at the same
time, file an high-priority PR for the compiler.