This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
- From: Karel Gardas <kgardas at objectsecurity dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <ras at objectsecurity dot com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:04:05 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> > the C++ runtime support that shipped with GCC-2.95.x (epecially the
> >string implementation) is known not to work in multi-threading
> >environment. GCC-3.x is much much better (even if the front-end is
> >slow).
>
> Dudes,
>
> If I had a dime for every time this question was asked, even though it's
> on the FAQ, or for every time some person tried to get 2.90.8 up on
> gcc-2.x and failed, or for every time some huge MT app in some
> impossible-to-reproduce, crazy hardware situation telecom/financial
> testing lab failed due to v2 MT string issues but passed with v3......
>
> ... there would be free empanadas and bordeaux for everybody.
>
> ;)
Indeed, sorry! So I'll start complain more about gcc3.x c++ compilation
speed problems on this list... :-) And perhaps I'll provide some time
statistic for our typical code...
Thanks,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas kgardas@objectsecurity.com
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com