This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC] PR libstdc++/9548 vs DR 231 (Ready)
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
I think the current behavior is wrong, sadly. I believe the arguments
advanced in this DR are well-formed. We should match "C" behavior.
Since precision is 6 by default, this behavior will only be triggered by
those who explicitly set precision to zero. I think that's reasonable.
Yes, in fact this is not that common...
Fine. As I wrote in my previous message, it's easy after all.
Do we all agree that implementing DR 231 is the best thing to do?
I really think this should be done.
... and in fact we'll end up _removing_ code from
the resolution of DR 231 is really neat.