Re: V3 PATCH: Various pedantic fixes

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:

[...]

| > Now that we have the new parser, I'm looking for the mainline tree to
| > stabilize a bit (I believe two weeks should be sufficient) before
| > creating an official branch for putting some support of compile time
| > reflection in the C++ front-end. 
| 
| I wouldn't think we would need a new branch, but I wouldn't fight against
| one, either.

I believe that path to cause less resistance.  People will not probably
consider the issues if they don't have a good picture of what is going
on, which means a complete patch, which in turn is not of small size.
Now large patches tend not to capture much attention...  However having a
branch around which you can test on real codes is a different thing
and more impressive :-).
We've just got a new parser (great jobs were done by Mark), and I'm not
sure Mark would like to see all sorts of extensions go in without
seeing the thingies in action and a thorough discussion.

Well, if enough people believe that a branch is not necessary I'm
happier with it.

-- Gaby