This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Possible regression from gcc-3.0.x to gcc-3.2.x with std::setprecision
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:51:56 +0100
- Subject: Re: Possible regression from gcc-3.0.x to gcc-3.2.x with std::setprecision
- References: <200212311113.gBVBDpf5006230@garfield.andypo.net> <20030102144313.3da84631.bkoz@redhat.com>
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
This should be fixed.
Indeed, and fixing it seems easy. But *why*?!?
Why, that is, more than digits10 + 1 digits are necessary for min()?
Paolo.