Re: gcc 3.2 compilation problem]

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:

| On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:10:52PM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
| > 
| > >Or, just mention that the simplistic version doesn't work, quoting Gaby?
| > 
| > I think Gaby's reponse today was the clearest I'd seen:
| > 
| > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-11/msg00180.html
| > 
| > Whatever you do, please include this info. Thanks for taking care of
| > this: it's too bad the libstdc++ docs have been incorrect!
| 
| *shrug*  It worked at the time we posted them.  I think that code was the
| outcome of a long thread between James Kanze, myself, and some third person
| whose name escapes me.

I'm surprised James let it go without saying anything, as I do know
from regular discussions  that he and me agree that that code should
not be written under any circumstance (I leave alone locale-specific
problems). 

-- Gaby