This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Atomic operations on the ARM

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
Cc: rearnsha at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:46:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Atomic operations on the ARM
Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
References: <20021003113115.01f93c38.bkoz@redhat.com><200210031638.g93GcMF20755@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

> > Perhaps the arm configuration should just use the generics, hmm?
> 
> It effectively does, with the patch I've just committed -- the only 
> difference between arm/atomicity.h and generic/atomicity.h is a comment 
> explaining that SWP doesn't work.

why don't you just kill the file and switch the config over to generic then?

References:
- Re: Atomic operations on the ARM
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Atomic operations on the ARM
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]