This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: please stop messing with the indentation

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: austern at apple dot com, ncm at cantrip dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 23:26:57 -0700
Subject: Re: please stop messing with the indentation
Organization: Red Hat / San Francisco
References: <20020808163505.C19912@cantrip.org><9C96BE70-AAF0-11D6-9F25-00039390D9E0@apple.com><20020808131429.A995@disaster.basement.lan><20020808114424.1534f77d.bkoz@redhat.com><20020808181635.A5831@disaster.basement.lan>

> The indentation within a class/function should be like you said, as
> C++STYLE describes.  For example, _Vector_alloc_base is wrong at
> present.
 
So I guess my point is, regardless of the namespace indenting rules, the
brace for classes and functions will not be at column zero. Correct? So
this is really not an issue?

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: please stop messing with the indentation
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- Re: please stop messing with the indentation
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: please stop messing with the indentation
  - From: Matt Austern
- Re: please stop messing with the indentation
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: please stop messing with the indentation
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: please stop messing with the indentation
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]