This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libstdc++/7445: poor performance of std::locale::classic() inmulti-threaded applications


Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
There was a reason that I locked the entire method, so that _S_classic
is guaranteed to only be set once. With the code right now, there are
a couple of problems....

Yikes.

I think the original patch was better. Sorry. Here's an update on
current sources. Let me know if this is what will work.

Index: src/locale.cc
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/locale.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -c -p -r1.62 locale.cc
*** src/locale.cc 31 Jul 2002 19:34:08 -0000 1.62
--- src/locale.cc 2 Aug 2002 16:20:20 -0000
*************** namespace std *** 284,294 ****
const locale&
locale::classic()
{
if (!_S_classic)
{
- static _STL_mutex_lock __lock __STL_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
_STL_auto_lock __auto(__lock);
- try {
// 26 Standard facets, 2 references.
--- 284,293 ----
const locale&
locale::classic()
{
+ static _STL_mutex_lock __lock __STL_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
if (!_S_classic)
{
_STL_auto_lock __auto(__lock);
try {
// 26 Standard facets, 2 references.



I still think the two problems I mentioned are still there even with
this version of the patch, namely

a) Two threads can enter the method at once, the first will get the
   lock, set up _S_classic, etc, and release the lock, then the 2nd
   will do exactly the same things again.
   This can be fixed by checking _S_classic again after the auto lock

b) If a second thread enters while another is in the process of setting
   up _S_classic, ie it has assigned _S_classic, but not initialised
   c_locale, the 2nd thread will return the unconstructed c_locale
   object.
   This can be fixed by setting _S_classic as the last thing in the
   method

I think the location of the static mutex doesn't matter.

So, again, I think the entire routine needs to be changed to something
like this... (comments included to indicate reasoning...)

<code>
  const locale&
  locale::classic()
  {
    // libstdc++/7445 - Optimisation to avoid the auto-lock once the initial
    // creation has been done
    if (_S_classic)
      return c_locale;

    static _STL_mutex_lock __lock __STL_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
    _STL_auto_lock __auto(__lock);

    // In case multiple threads call locale::classic() at the same time with
    // _S_classic unset, check if another thread might have already done the
    // work
    if (_S_classic)
      return c_locale;

    locale::_Impl* __tmp_S_classic = 0;
    try
      {
        // 26 Standard facets, 2 references.
        // One reference for _M_classic, one for _M_global
        facet** f = new(&facet_vec) facet*[_GLIBCPP_NUM_FACETS];
        for (size_t __i = 0; __i < _GLIBCPP_NUM_FACETS; ++__i)
          f[__i] = 0;

        __tmp_S_classic = new (&c_locale_impl) _Impl(f, 2, true);
        new (&c_locale) locale(__tmp_S_classic);

        // Set _S_classic last when we know we have done all the initialisation
        _S_classic = _S_global = __tmp_S_classic;
      }
    catch(...)
      {
        // Just call destructor, so that locale_impl_c's memory is
        // not deallocated via a call to delete.
        if (tmp_S_classic)
          tmp_S_classic->~_Impl();
        _S_classic = _S_global = 0;
        __throw_exception_again;
      }
    return c_locale;
  }
</code>
Andrew.
--
       Andrew Pollard - Senior Software Engineer (APF)
   Brooks-PRI Automation - Planning and Logistics Solutions
Email: Andrew.Pollard@brooks-pri.com - Tel: +44 (0)118 9215603


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]