This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
RE: libstdc++ licensing question
- From: Dan Kegel <dkegel at ixiacom dot com>
- To: 'Nathan Myers ' <ncm-nospam at cantrip dot org>, "'libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:48:37 -0700
- Subject: RE: libstdc++ licensing question
I stand corrected. Yes, the intent of the GNU licenses is
to empower the user to fix bugs in the GNU-licensed software
and then run the fixed application. That may mean including
a build script, even...
From: Nathan Myers
Sent: 7/23/2002 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: libstdc++ licensing question
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:53:01AM -0700, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Michael Fimin wrote:
> > Hi, I have a question regarding GCC standard C++ library licensing.
> > I going to use libstdc++ in my comercial project.
> > My program will not be covered by GPL license (the source code won't
> > provided) and I'm going to distribute libstdc++.so (Solaris version)
> > with my program. Is this legal?
> Yes, it's legal.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html
Wrong. He's not just talking about distributing a program linked
against somebody else's copy of the library, he's talking about
distributing the library itself.
Practically speaking, the requirement is that a user of his program
has to be equipped to compile a replacement libstdc++ that will link
and run with his program.
(Unfortunately there is a loophole in the license: if he uses an
altered compiler to build his program and the library, a user may
not be equipped to generate a compatible library image. I wonder
what can be done to close that loophole.)
ncm at cantrip dot org