This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should 3.2 still search backward/ headers by default?

From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 21:27:31 -0400
Subject: Re: Should 3.2 still search backward/ headers by default?
References: <20020524160946.A25546@disaster.basement.lan> <m3ptzl5inp.fsf@merlin.nerim.net>

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:40:26PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:
> 
> | Opinions?
> 
> Are there strong reasons not to do so?

Not strong ones.  Just weaker ones (simplification, removal of unneeded code,
etc).  I'm happy to see them searched by default, but happier to see them
only present when the user explicitly requests pre-Standard stuff.

Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should 3.2 still search backward/ headers by default?
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- Should 3.2 still search backward/ headers by default?
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Should 3.2 still search backward/ headers by default?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]