Re: [RFC] libstdc++/6720 and libstdc++/6671

[Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>]

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:-

> Nathan Myers <ncm-nospam@cantrip.org> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> | When you discard the solution, the problems come back.
> 
> Certainly.  But we should take care not to cure the symptoms and forget
> about the problem.  Don't shoot the messenger.  The real problem is
> elsewhere, and the <ext/xxx> is just exposing something much more
> deeper, and no it isn't poor naming. 
> 
>     #include <cmath>
>     int main()
>     {
>        double x = std::sin(9.8);
>     }
> 
> should not provoque compilation error just because there happens to be
> a file named cmath in the current directory.  Cure that problem and
> the symptoms with go away.

I don't agree with your solution of special-casing certain header names,
and I don't think Zack does either.   We already have an over-specified
include look-up mechanism.

Neil.