This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: V3 PATCH: WindISS support
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 00:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: V3 PATCH: WindISS support
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> --On Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:08:46 PM -0400 Phil Edwards <email@example.com>
> > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:40:39PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >> * config/os/windiss/bits/ctype_base.h: New file.
> >> * config/os/windiss/bits/ctype_inline.h: Likewise.
> >> * config/os/windiss/bits/ctype_noninline.h: Likewise.
> >> * config/os/windiss/bits/os_defines.h: Likewise.
> > Some of these files have copyright dates that look a bit odd. I'm not
> > certain of the rules, i.e., date when file was first checked in versus
> > date when some incarnation of the file existed somewhere.
> These are all slightly tweaked copies of files that already existing
> in the tree; I copied over the generic code and made a few changes as
> necessary. So, I preserved the old copyright dates.
> I think that's the right thing to do, but I could be wrong...
I did exactly the same thing for the CRIS port, and was asked to
change copyright dates (and did) to the year of the first
check-in of the "new" file. Consistency?