This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] libstdc++/6533

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 15:50:22 -0700
Subject: Re: [v3] libstdc++/6533
Organization: Red Hat/San Francisco
References: <20020501151809.420a0fd8.bkoz@redhat.com><200205012222.SAA31274@makai.watson.ibm.com>
Reply-to: bkoz at redhat dot com


> 	I did not mean "wrong" in terms of why you switched, but wrong
> 	in terms of should that coding style be avoided. Very similar
> 	code is used in other parts of libstdc++-v3.

Doubtful, but I'm open to the possibility. A quick scan does not support
this, but thanks for the suggestion. Again, this is an error on my part,
not the library standard or the compiler. 

-benjamin

References:
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/6533
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/6533
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]