This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Avoid excessive flushing on lower-layer handle

From: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:34:02 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: PATCH: Avoid excessive flushing on lower-layer handle
References: <20020423111336.762b23b4.bkoz@redhat.com> <200204240033.g3O0Xup99109@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
Reply-to: rittle at labs dot mot dot com

I wrote:

> Committed to mainline (as previously posted) with these new test cases
> as tested on i386-*-freebsd4.5 and elsewhere.  Now testing on branch
> as required (I know it is approved, but I hadn't tested it personally
> yet).  I will install there ASAP (within hours of now).

Committed to 3.1 branch as approved.  Tested on i386-*-freebsd4.5
without regression.  And, for the record, all current C++/libstdc++-v3
failures on this platform have been studied and are expected.  FYI,
the publicly posted reports from ref4 show extra C++ failures compared
to ref5 and my own machine; but they are all related to using an old
copy of binutils.  The release is looking great for this platform.

cvs update -j1.1160 -j1.1161 ChangeLog
cvs update -j1.10 -j1.11 include/std/std_fstream.h
cvs update -j1.32 -j1.33 include/bits/fstream.tcc
cvs update -j1.6 -j1.7 testsuite/27_io/narrow_stream_objects.cc

References:
- Re: PATCH: Avoid excessive flushing on lower-layer handle
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: PATCH: Avoid excessive flushing on lower-layer handle
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]