This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libstdc++/4150: catastrophic performance decrease in C++ code


>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:

> is there any reason why we can't leave the file pointer at the end of the
> last read block, rather than at the beginning as we do now?

Which is what libio does, and which would seem to be the only way to avoid
this sort of problem.  Can anyone enlighten me as to the design
goals/decisions of the current implementation?

Continuing to hack...

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]