This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
sparcv9 vs. sparc testresults
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:14:52 -0700
- Subject: sparcv9 vs. sparc testresults
Nice to see sparc-solaris testresults back into the acceptable range.
However... how come the sparcv9 testresults are so much better for libstdc++?
It looks like these toolchains are configured identically.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00316.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00317.html
Extra fails:
FAIL: 18_support/numeric_limits.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filebuf_virtuals.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/ios_base_storage.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/streambuf.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/stringbuf.cc execution test
?
-benjamin